10/31/2023 0 Comments Cicada 3301 4chan thread archiveUntil that time, It doesn't seem like discussing what to do with information in the case of deletion is warranted. If this is contested and someone believes the article should again be deleted a new discussion must take place regarding the new sources. The old deletion discussion happened before new sources determined notability. SyncMaster192 ( talk) 23:02, 27 November 2013 (UTC) Reply Nobody has nominated the article for deletion since the two new November 2013 sources determined notability. The Province Washington Times The Daily Banter Some sources that Wikipedia doesnt consider Reliable sources might be better. Although information in all this articles is not always correct. I dont know how sources should be properly archived and published here. (Still just a few, but expect more.) - Charles Edwin Shipp ( talk) 00:46, 26 November 2013 (UTC) Reply Charles Edwin Shipp ( talk) 23:56, 25 November 2013 (UTC) Reply Consider, , A few current references. The pronunciation is not given here as it should be. Consider putting it in the Cicada article, where the pronunciation is given. I find it very interesting and it is receiving new visibility. If this page is deleted, I would like to read this information somewhere else.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |